d.  Doing Business  As:

3.  Ratings Applied for:
0  Airframe
0  Class 1 
0  Class 2 
0  Class 3 
0  Class 4
0  Powerplant
0  Class 1
0  Class 2
0  Class 3
0  Propeller
0  Class 1
0  Class 2
0  Avionics/ Radio
0  Class 1
0  Class 2
0  Class 3
0  Instrument
0  Class 1
0  Class 2
0  Class 3
0  Class 4
0  Accessories
0  Class 1
0  Class 2
0  Class 3
0  Limited
0  Airframe
0  Powerplant
0  Propeller
0  Instruments
0  Accessories
0  Landing Gear
0  Floats
0  Avionics/radio
0  Rotor Blades
0  Fabric
0  Emergency Equip.
0  Non-Dest. Test
0  Other
0  Specialised Service
(List Process Specification(s))

4. List of Maintenance Functions contracted to an outside Maintenance Organisation:
5. Applicants Certification
Name of Owner (Include name(s) of individual Owner, all partners, or corporation name given the state, province, or country and date of incorporation)
I hereby certify that I have been authorised by the approved maintenance organisation identified in Item 1 above to make this application and that statements attached hereto are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Date:
Authorised Signature:
AMO ARSC dated 12/98 Page 1of 2
For CAA Use Only
Record of Action
Approved Maintenance Organisation Inspection For CAA Use Only
6. Remarks (Identify by item number.  Include deficiencies found and ratings denied)
7. Findings - Recommendations 8. Date of Inspection
0  A. AMO was found to comply with requirements of Part 6.
0  B.  AMO was found to comply with requirements of Part 6, except for deficiencies listed in Item 6.
0  C. Recommend Certificate with rating applied for on application be issued.
0  D. Recommend Certificate with rating applied for on application (EXCEPT those listed in Item 6) be issued.
9. CAA Office Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Printed Names of Inspectors

10.  Supervising or Assigned Inspector
ACTION TAKEN CERTIFICATE ISSUED Inspector’s Signature
0  APPROVED
As shown on certificate issued Number
on date shown
0  DISAPPROVED Date Inspector’s Printed Name Title
AMO ARSC dated 12/98 Page 2 of 2
FAA Form 8310-3
IS: 6.2.1.12 QUALITY SYSTEM
(a) In order to show compliance with 9.2.2.3, an AMO should establish its quality system in accordance with the instruction and information contained in the following paragraphs.
Quality System – Organisation Examples
(a) The following diagrams illustrate two typical examples of AMO Quality organisations.
(1) A typical large AMO.
(2) A typical small AMO.
JAR 145, Section 2, Appendix 4
IS: 6.3.1.2 HOUSING AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
(a) For ongoing maintenance of aircraft, aircraft hangars shall be available and large enough to accommodate aircraft during maintenance activities.
(b) Where the hangar is not owned by the AMO, it is recommended to:
(1) Establish proof of authorisation to use hangar;
(2) Demonstrate sufficiency of hangar space to carry out planned base maintenance by preparing a projected aircraft hangar visit plan relative to the maintenance programme;
(3) Update the aircraft hangar visit plan on a regular basis;
(4) Ensure, for aircraft component maintenance, aircraft component workshops are large enough to accommodate the components on planned maintenance;
(5) Ensure aircraft hangar and aircraft component workshop structures prevent the ingress of rain, hail, ice, snow, wind and dust, etc.;
(6) Ensure workshop floors are sealed to minimise dust generation; and
(7) Demonstrate access to hangar accommodation for usage during inclement weather for minor scheduled work and/or lengthy defect rectification.
(c) Aircraft maintenance staff shall be provided with an area where they may study maintenance instructions and complete maintenance records in a proper manner.
Note:  It is acceptable to combine any or all of the above requirements into one office subject to the staff having sufficient room to carry out assigned tasks.
(d) Hangars used to house aircraft together with office accommodation shall be such as to insure a clean, effective and conformable working environment.
(1) Temperatures should be maintained at a comfortable level.
(2) Dust and any other airborne contamination should be kept to a minimum and not permitted to reach a level in the work task area where visible aircraft/component surface contamination is evident.